Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Module 6 – Key Case Reading
<
Cortez v. Walmart Stores, P.602
<
Ater completing the module reading and this case, please write a 3 – 5 page paper identifying and applying your Module learning as follows…
<
Briefing a Case: Please (1) Identify the plaintiff and the defendant, (2) The legal Issue, (3) A paragraph summarizing the facts, (4) The court’s legal conclusion and (5) Identify and apply 3-5 learned concepts from our reading that you can apply to this case.
<
<
(Will send screenshots via email)

HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE DRAFT/ESSAY)

guidance on how to write a paper based on the Cortez v. Walmart Stores case.

Cortez v. Walmart Stores is a case that centers around allegations of employment discrimination against Walmart. The following is an example of how to structure a paper on this case:

1. Identify the Plaintiff and the Defendant:

The plaintiff in the case is Betty Cortez, an employee of Walmart. The defendant is Walmart Stores, Inc., the multinational retail corporation.

2. The Legal Issue:

The legal issue in the case is whether Walmart discriminated against Cortez based on her age and sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

3. Summary of the Facts:

Betty Cortez was a long-time employee of Walmart, having worked for the company for over 25 years. In 2012, she was terminated from her position as an assistant manager. Cortez alleged that she was terminated because of her age and sex, and that Walmart engaged in a pattern of discrimination against older, female employees. Walmart denied the allegations and argued that Cortez was terminated due to poor job performance.

4. The Court’s Legal Conclusion:

The court found in favor of Walmart and dismissed Cortez’s discrimination claims. The court held that Cortez failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADEA and Title VII, and that Walmart had provided legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for her termination based on her poor job performance.

5. Application of Learned Concepts:

In analyzing this case, here are some key concepts from our reading that can be applied:

• Discrimination: Cortez alleged that Walmart discriminated against her based on her age and sex. Discrimination refers to unfair treatment of an individual or group based on their characteristics such as race, gender, age, and religion.
• Prima Facie Case: The court found that Cortez failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. A prima facie case is a minimum set of facts that a plaintiff must prove to establish a case. In this case, Cortez had to show that she was a member of a protected class, that she was qualified for her job, that she was terminated, and that she was replaced by a younger, male employee.
• Legitimate, Non-discriminatory Reasons: Walmart provided legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for Cortez’s termination based on her poor job performance. Employers must provide legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for their actions, and must be able to demonstrate that these reasons were not based on discriminatory motives.

In conclusion, the Cortez v. Walmart Stores case highlights the importance of protecting employees from discrimination based on their age, sex, and other characteristics. It also demonstrates the legal principles of prima facie case and legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons, which are critical for employers to understand and comply with.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now